|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Back
CENTRALLY
SPONSORED SCHEMES
|
| |
Macro Management Plan
|
| |
National Watershed Development Programme For Rainfed Areas (NWDPR
Extension Program)
|
| |
PROGRAMME
DETAILS |
| |
| 1.
SCHEME: MP-A-06
2. PROGRAMME
NAME:National Watershed
Development Programme For Rainfed Areas (NWDPRA)
3. OBJECT
OF PROGRAMME:
National Watershed
Development Project for Rainfed areas is sponsored
by Govt. of India. It was started in Madhya Pradesh
during VIIIth Five- Year Plan in the Year 1990-91
in 385 blocks having less than 30% assured irrigated
area. The total area of 385 selected Watersheds
was 852753 ha. An area of 660202 ha. was treated
against the total treatable area of 749641 ha. with
an expenditure of Rs.129.42 crores.
The project carries
following objectives :
- Insitu moisture conservation
and use of natural resources i.e. land water and
vegetation .
- Scientific management of land
and water.
- Enhancement of production and
productivity in rainfed areas.
- To train and to motivate the
farmers for enhancing the productivity through
the schemes of concerned departments.
- Promotion of Agriculture / Cottage
Industries.
- Employment generation during
and after the project.
- To ensure the peoples participation
in project activities.
4. PRESENT STATUS:
The scheme is continued during IXth
Five- year Plan and 280 new watersheds have been
selected in the blocks . The details of the selected
watersheds are as under:-.
1. Total geographical area 13.93
lakh ha.
2.Arable land 8.40 lakh ha.
3.Non arable land 2.92 lakh ha.
4.Treatable area 10.97 lakh ha.
5. Area treated so far 3.23 Lakh
ha.
5. ANALYSIS FOR THE LAST
THREE YEARS :
Rs. in Lakh
YEAR |
CENTRAL
SHARE
|
EXPENDITURE
|
Previous
Balance
|
Release
|
Total
Amt. Available
|
Central
|
State
|
Total
|
2000-01
|
17.78 |
2062.77
|
2080.55
|
1982.14
|
42.95
|
2025.09
|
2001-02
|
- |
891.00
|
891.00
|
971.37
|
107.93
|
1079.30
|
2002-03*
|
- |
1046.98
|
1046.98
|
840.07
|
93.34
|
933.41
|
* upto Dec. 2002
6. AREA
OF OPERATIONS:
43 Districts of
Madhya Pradesh covering 280 development blocks.
7. MAJOR
AREAS OF CONCERN:
-
Management of
natural resources.
-
Conservation
of Land, water and vegetation.
-
Enhancement
of production and productivity in rainfed areas.
-
Promotion of
Agriculture / Rural Industries.
-
Employment
Generation.
-
Improvement
in Socio-economic condition of watershed population.
-
Promotion of
animal husbandry.
8. INTERVENTIONS:
-
Introduction
of watershed management programmes .
-
Adoption of
soil and water conservation measures.
-
Introduction
of recommended production technologies in conjunction
with soil and water conservation activities.
-
Introduction
of Rural / Agricultural Industries.
-
Labour oriented
development activities for employment generation.
-
Enhancement
of per capita income through better agricultural
production, employment generation by creation
of Rural / Agricultural Industries and project
activities. Empowerment of women will encourage
their participation in decision making at every
front. Community organisations would encourage
brotherhood amongst the villagers.
-
Introduction
of improved animal breeds, castration of scrub
bulls, animal health care and improved fodder.
9. PROPOSED
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS :
S.No.
|
Name
of component
|
1 |
Management Component |
| |
a. Administrative cost |
| |
b Community organization |
| |
c. Training Programme |
2 |
Development Cost |
| |
a. Natural Resource Management
|
| |
b.Farm production system for |
| |
c.Livelihood support system
for landless families |
10. JUSTIFICATION :
For achieving the desired objectives
of different activities
11 OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION
OF GOI & STATE GOVT.
Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
2003-04 |
1080.00 |
120.00 |
1200.00 |
PROPOSED
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
(NWDPRA)
Physical
Targets & Financial Requirements 2002-03
Rs. in Lakh
S.No. |
Component |
Unit
|
NORMS
|
2002-003
|
Physical
|
Financial |
| |
Management
Component:
- Administrative Cost
- Community Organization
-
Training
Programme
|
|
10% of
Cost
7.5% of Cost
5.0% of Cost
|
|
1200.00
90.00
60.00
|
| |
Development
Cost :
- Natural Resource Management
- Farm Production system
for land owning families
- Livelihood support system
for landless families
|
Hect.
|
50% of Cost
20% of Cost
7.5% of Cost
|
110000 |
600.00
240.00
90.00
|
Total
|
|
|
1200.00 |
| GOI Share
90% |
|
|
1080.00 |
| State
Share 10% |
|
|
120.00 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
River
Valley Project and Flood Prone River Scheme
( RVP & FPR ) |
| |
PROGRAMME DETAILS
1.
SCHEME CODE: MP-A-07
2. PROGRAMME
NAME:River Valley Project and Flood Prone River
Scheme ( RVP & FPR )
3. OBJECT
OF PROGRAMME:
-
Prevention of Land degradation by adoption
of multi-disciplinary integrated approach in the catchment
areas.
-
Improvement of land Capability and moisture
regime in the water sheds.
-
Promotion of land use to match land capability.
-
Prevention of soil loss from the catchments
to reduce siltation in the reservoirs.
-
People's involvement in the management
of catchments.
-
Upgradation of skills in planning and
execution of land development programmes in the catchment
areas.
4. PRESENT STATUS :
For the conservation of natural resources
and sustainable production with the help of Central Government
scheme of River Valley Project (RVP) was started during 1961-62,
programme of Flood Prone River (FPR) was started from the year
1981-82
At present RVP/FPR schemes are being implemented
in 5 catchments, i.e., Chambal, Mata-Tila, Tawa,Mahi and Sone
river.BY Agri. Deptt. And in narmada catchment by Narmada vally
dev. Department.
5 ANALYSIS FOR LAST THREE YEARS :
Rs. in Lakh
YEAR |
CENTRAL
SHARE
|
EXPENDITURE
|
Previous Balance
|
Release
|
Total Amt. Available
|
Central
|
State
|
Total
|
| 2000-01 |
277.23
|
430.00
|
707.230
|
1253.18
|
12.27
|
1265.45
|
2001-02
|
- |
891.00
|
891.00
|
551.40
|
61.27
|
612.67
|
2002-03*
|
- |
715.14
|
715.14
|
757.80
|
84.20
|
842.00
|
* Upto Dec. 2002
6. AREA OF OPERATION :
As per approved programme for the year 2001-02
total 98 watersheds are being treated in 5 catchments spread
over 14 districts of the state by Agri. Department.
7. MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN
:
i. High rate of siltation in reservoirs .
ii. Recurrence of floods.
8. CONSTRAINTS :
i. Cost norms on water harvesting structure
should be fixed as per prevailing labour rates and material
cost.
ii. Only per hectare cost should be fixed by
GOI and state should be allove to decide the cost factors of
all other components.
9. PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENT:
S.No.
|
Name of component
|
1 |
Works:
i. Survey and demarcation.
ii. Treatment of agriculture and non agriculture land including
drainage line treatment. |
2 |
Infra structure |
3 |
Hydrological and sediment monitoring. |
4 |
Construction of stores ,labs, camp huts. |
5 |
Maintenance of previous works in community land. |
6 |
Transfer of Technology |
10 JUSTIFICATION:
This programme is being implemented in the catchments of rivers
to minimise the flow of silt, soil erosion, with rain water
thereby prolong the life of reservoirs and minimise the occurrences
of floods.
11 OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI
& STATE GOVT.
(in Lakh Rs.)
Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
2003-04 |
560.00 |
62.22 |
622.22 |
12. PROPOSED
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
(RVP & FPR)
Physical Targets
& Financial Requirements 2002-03
Rs. in Lakh
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2002-003 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Works
:
- Survey, demarcation & Field investigation
of WPR's
- Project Activities
- Entry Point Activities
|
Hect. |
6500 |
20000 |
15.00
267.22
10.00 |
| 2 |
Infra-structure
:
- Pay, allowances
- Contingencies
- Hydrologic & Silt Monitoring
- Construction of Stores, Labs, Huts
- Corpus of funds
|
|
|
|
250.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
10.00 |
| 3 |
Transfer
of Technology :
- Training/ Workshop for staff
- State level one day training
- State level 3 days training
- Field level Trainings
- Demonstrations
- Field visits
- Publications
- Services to NGO's
|
|
|
|
15.00 |
| Total
of Agriculture Department |
|
|
|
622.22 |
| Total
for RVP&FPR |
|
|
|
|
| GOI
share 90% |
|
|
|
560.00 |
| State
Share 10% |
|
|
|
62.22 |
| Allocation
to NVDA |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Augmentation of Ground Water
|
| |
|
PROGRAMME DETAILS
1. SCHEME CODE
: MP-A-13
2. PROGRAMME NAME
: Scheme For Augmentation
Of Ground Water
3. OBJECT OF PROGRAMME :
1. To augment
ground water storage and control decline of water table.
2. To improve
ground water availability.
3. To reduce
surface runoff and soil erosion.
4. PRESENT STATUS:
Small tanks,
Percolation Tanks and Water Harvesting Structures are
being constructed by the Department of Agriculture under
Micro-Minor irrigation programme. Being solely a State
sector programme there has been financial constraints
and the programme could not be implemented as per required
size. Therefore it is proposed to have the proposed scheme
of Augmentation of ground Water.
5 ANALYSIS FOR LAST
THREE YEARS :
|
YEAR |
CENTRAL
SHARE |
EXPENDITURE |
|
| Previous
Balance |
Release |
Total
Amt. Available |
Central |
State |
Total |
|
| |
2000-01 |
- |
56.97 |
56.97 |
58.20 |
6.47 |
64.67 |
| |
2001-02 |
- |
540.00 |
540.00 |
677.57 |
75.29 |
752.85 |
| |
2002-03* |
- |
765.49 |
765.49 |
716.46 |
79.61 |
796.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Exp.upto Dec.2002
6 AREA OF OPERATION
:
Whole
rainfed area of Madhya Pradesh will be covered by proposed
new scheme. At present only 26% of total cultivated area
(255.80 lakh hectares) is under irrigation. The scope
of ground water utilization for sustainable agriculture
makes the augmentation of ground water inevitable. Hence
the scheme will be implemented in all the 45 districts
of Madhya Pradesh, excepting command areas of irrigation
schemes.
The priority for implementing the scheme will depend
on the crisis level.
7
MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN :
1.
Degradation of water quality.
2.
Increased surface run-off and soil erosion.
8. INTERVENTIONS
:
1.
Control over surface run-off and soil erosion.
2.
Construction of structure for re-charge of ground
water.
9
PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENTS :
| S.No. |
COMPONENT |
EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF NEW COMPONENT |
| 1 |
Percolation Tank |
Percolation
tanks are water storage structures where runoff
water is stored on aquifers which permit comparatively
fast entry of water at ground surface. This results
the ground water recharge. |
10. JUSTIFICATION :
All these activities
will enhance the ground-water recharge and will reduce
run-off and soil erosion.
11.
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI & STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
985.01 |
109.45 |
1094.45 |
PROPOSED
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
(Augmentation
of Ground Water)
Physical
Targets & Financial Requirements 2002-03
Rs. in Lakh
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2002-003 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Construction
of Percolation Tanks |
Nos. |
500000 |
219 |
1095.00 |
| Total |
|
|
|
1095.00 |
| GOI
Share 90% |
|
|
|
985.01 |
| State
Share 10% |
|
|
|
109.45 |
|

|
| |
|
| |
Integrated Cereal Dev. Prog.(Rice) |
| |
|
MADHYA
PRADESH
PROGRAMME DETAILS
1. SCHEME CODE :
MP-A-01
2.
PROGRAMME NAME
: Integrated Cereal Development Programme
(Rice)
3. OBJECT
OF PROGRAMME : To increase production and productivity
of Rice
4. PRESENT
STATUS Area, Production & Productivity
of Paddy crop is as under (Pridiction) :-
Year |
RICE |
| AREA
in 'ooo Hec |
Production
in '000 MT |
Productivity
in Kg. Per Hectare |
| 2002-03 |
17.20 |
19.50 |
1135 |
| 2003-04 |
17.80 |
21.60 |
1200 |
5. ANALYSIS OF LAST THREE YEAR
:
Rs. in Lakh
| YEAR |
CENTRAL
SHARE |
EXPENDITURE |
| Previous
Balance |
Release |
Total
Amt. Available |
Central |
State |
Total |
| 2000-01 |
-0.41 |
70.50 |
70.09 |
102.72 |
22.39 |
125.12 |
| 2001-02 |
0 |
157.50 |
157.50 |
81.82 |
9.09 |
90.91 |
| 2002-03* |
0 |
149.50 |
149.50 |
58.97 |
6.55 |
65.52 |
* - Position upto December 2002
6. AREA OF OPERATION
: All 45 Districts of Madhya Pradesh.
7. MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN
:
1.
Sowing is mostly done by broadcasting method.
2.
Paddy cultivation in upland and unsuitable areas.
3. Non-availability
of suitable High Yielding Varieties and Hybrid seeds.
4.
High incidence of Insect-pests and diseases.
5.
Problem of Weeds.
6.
Erratic rainfall pattern.
7. Lack of area
specific technology.
8.
Drought resistant early varieties
9.
Im-balanced and low fertiliser use
10. Small area under assured irrigation
11.
Low seed replacement rate
8. INTERVENTIONS:
1. Popularisation
of line sowing.
2.
Replacement of upland paddy with suitable, sustainable
crop.
3.
Inclusion of improved method of planting. large
scale of population of green manuaring for paddy..
4.
More emphasis on Organic farming , Integrated
Nutrient Management and Integrated Pest Management.
5.
Discouraging farmers for summer cultivation of
paddy.
6.
Strengthening of training facilities to farmers
and Extension workers.
7. Pre-monsoon
nursery raising in irrigated area
8. Increase
in seed replacement rate
9. PROPOSED
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS:
| S.No. |
COMPONENTS |
EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF COMPONENT |
| 1 |
Purchase
of Breeder seed |
For
easy availability of latest varieties to ensure
higher seed replacement rate |
| 2 |
Incentive
on production of
a.
Foundation seed
b.
Certified seed |
To ensure
large availability of foundation & certified
seed. |
| 3 |
Incentive
on distribution of certified seed |
To increase
seed replacement rate |
| 4 |
Integrated
Nutrient Management :
Subsidy on Zinc Sulphate/ Zypsum / Pyrite |
33 Distt.
are deficient in Zinc & Sulphur, hence use
of Zinc Sulphate / Zypsum / Pyrite is to be promoted |
| 5 |
Plant
Protection
a. Subsidy
on sprayer / duster
-Hand operated
-Power operated
b Weedicide |
To promote
use of weedicides, insecticides and fungicides.
Weed control through labour is a major problem
. To overcome this, it is essential to provide
incentives on use of weedicides . |
| 6 |
Field
Demonstration
a.
Technological Demonstration
b.Cultivation on Paddy bunds
i.
Arhar
ii.
Castor
iii.
Sesamum
c.
Bund formation on unbunded
Fields |
To disseminate
new technology among the farmers. Intensive farming
for utilization of bunds & bund formation
on periphery of paddy fields. |
| 7 |
Seed Treatment
a.
Seed Treating Material
b. Seed Treating Drum |
It is
an important measure to protect crop from seed
borne diseases. |
| 8 |
Training
:
a.
State level Workshop
b.
Training of Trainer
c.
Training of staff
d.
Training of farmer |
For effective
transfer of technology to the farmers & extension
workers. |
| 9 |
Technology
Transfer Lab to land & Land to Lab :
a. Farmers
visit
b.
Interface at Agro-climatic zones |
Problems
of field may be discussed face to face with the
scientists and solutions may be tested in the
field |
| 10 |
Contingency |
For POL
etc. |
10.
JUSTIFICATION :
1.
Approximately 17 lakh hectares area in Madhya
Pradesh is sown under paddy crop, but productivity
is far below the national average data ( M.P.:1073
Kgs per hectare ; INDIA 2807 Kgs per Hectare). In order
to achieve the national productivity level this programme
needs special thrust. For this we plan to step-up the
productivity level upto 1500 Kgs per hectare by 2002-03
2.
Special efforts are needed to introduce hybrid
rice seed production and cultivation specially where
sufficient irrigation water is available. Popularization
of new High yielding varieties of early and medium duration
is a priority. Purchase of breeder seed, production
of foundation and certified seed and distribution of
certified seed among the cultivator for popularisation
of newly released varieties.
3.
Introducing low input technology and imparting
training not only to the farmers, but also to Trainers
and Extension Workers upto Block level .
4.
Conducting 3 Field Demonstrations per year per
Block in all Rice growing areas to demonstrate the effectiveness
of technology like, new High Yielding Varieties, Organic
Farming, INM, IPM etc. Cultivation on paddy field bunds
for intensive farming and bund formation on periphery
of unbunded paddy fields.
5.
Integrated Nutrient Management as a coherent
strategy needs to be given top priority . Most of the
soils are poor in micro-nutrients especially Zinc and
Sulphur. To cover-up this deficiency, provision of
subsidy is being proposed on use of Zinc sulphate .
Efforts to popularise green manuring and its seed production
has also been included. In the proposed programme .
6.
Paddy crop suffers from very high incidence of
number of insect-pest attacks and diseases. Subsidy
on Seed Treating material and Seed Treating Drums, Sprayers
and Dusters has been included in the programme.
7.
Weeds are major problem in Kharif Rice crop
especially in direct sown upland and early-medium varieties.
Subsidy on weedicides to small and marginal farmers
especially tribals is a must.
8.
Technology transfer from research to farmers
and problem of farmers to research, farmers visit and
interface at agro-climate level has been included in
the programme
11
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI & STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
70.00 |
7.78 |
77.78 |
PROPOSED PROGRAMME
COMPONENTS (ICDP-Rice)
Physical
Targets & Financial Requirements 2003-04
Rs. in Lakh
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2003-04 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Purchase
of Breeder Seed |
Qtls. |
2000 |
200 |
4.00 |
| 2 |
Incentives
on production of :
- Foundation Seed
- Certified Seed
|
Qtls.
Qtls. |
200
200 |
2000
4000 |
4.00
8.00 |
| 3 |
Incentive
on distribution of certified seed |
Qtls. |
200 |
3000 |
6.00 |
| 4 |
Integrated
Nutrient Management
- Subsidy on use of Zinc Sulphate/ Zypsum/
Pyrite
|
Hect. |
25%
or 500 |
1000 |
5.00 |
| 5 |
Plant
Protection
- Subsidy on sprayers / dusters :
-
-
Hand Operated
-
-
Power Operated
|
Nos
Nos
Hect. |
25%
or 600
25% or 2000
25% or 500 |
500
50
200 |
3.00
1.00
1.00 |
| 6 |
Seed Treatment
:
- Seed Treating Material
- Seed Treating Drums
|
Hect.
Nos |
25
25% or 500 |
7500
161 |
1.76
0.80 |
| 7 |
Sprinkler
Set/Pipe line/rain gun
- SC/ST/S&M/Women farmers
- Others
|
Nos
Nos |
25%
or 5500
25% or 3630 |
125 |
11.42 |
| 8 |
Training
- State level Workshop
- Training of Trainers
- Training of staff
- Training of farmers
|
Nos |
50000
28000
20000
20000 |
1
7
45
45 |
0.50
1.96
9.00
9.00 |
| 9 |
Field
Demonstration:
- Technology Demonstration
- Cultivation on paddy bunds
-
-
Arhar
-
-
Castor
-
-
Sesamum
- Bund formation on unbunded fields
|
Acre
Nos
Nos
Nos
Acre |
1000
30
50
15
1000 |
500
4000
1500
1000
700 |
5.00
1.20
0.75
0.15
7.00 |
| 10 |
Technology
Transfer Lab to land & Land to Lab :
- Farmers Visit
- Interface at Agro-climatic Zones
|
Nos
Nos |
50000
20000 |
3
4 |
1.50
0.80 |
| 11 |
Communication
support :
- Through printed Material
- Through Electonic Material
|
Nos
Nos |
25000
25000 |
3
1 |
0.75
0.25 |
| 12 |
Contingency |
District |
15000 |
45 |
6.75 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
77.78 |
|
GOI Share 90% |
|
|
|
70.00 |
|
State Share 10% |
|
|
|
7.78 |
|

|
| |
|
| |
Integrated
Cereal Dev. Prog.(C.C) |
| |
|
PROGRAMME DETAILS
1. SCHEME
CODE : M.P. - A-02
2. PROGRAMME
NAME : Integrated Cereal Development
Programme ( Coarse Cereal )
3. OBJECT
OF PROGRAMME :To increase
production and productivity of Wheat, Jowar,
Bajra and Kodo-Kutki.
4. PRESENT
STATUS (Pridiction):
5. ANALYSIS OF LAST THREE YEARS:
Upto December 2002
6.AREA
OF OPERATION : All 45 Districts of Madhya Ptradesh.
7.MAJOR AREAS
OF CONCERN :
1.
Large area under rainfed farming.
2.
Inadequate availability of superior quality
of HYV seeds suited to area
specific farming conditions.
3.
Inadequate and imbalanced use of fertilisers,
Micro-nutrients &
Bio-fertilisers.
4.
Lack of area specific technology.
5.
Drainage congestion in low lying areas specially
in canal commands.
6. Lack of training and extension material
to disseminate the available technology.
8. INTERVENTIONS:
1. Re-organisation
of seed production and distribution system.
2. Greater
emphasis on Organic farming, Integrated Nutrient Management
and
Integrated Pest Management through demonstration and
strengthened
extension system.
3. Improvement
in irrigation and water management system.
4.
Strengthening of training facilities to farmers
as well as to the
Extension workers.
5. Use
of electronic media and better utilisation of publicity
system.
9..
PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENTS :
| S.No. |
COMPONENTS |
EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF COMPONENT |
| 1 |
Purchase
of Breeder seed |
For
easy availability of latest varieties to ensure
higher seed replacement rate. |
| 2 |
Incentive
on production of :
a. Foundation
seed
b.
Certified seed. |
For rapid multiplication of seed
and to ensure large availability of
foundation & certified seed. |
| 3 |
Incentive
on :
a.Foundation seed distribution
b.Certified seed distribution |
To increase the seed replacement rate |
| 4 |
Integrated
Nutrient Management :
a. Subsidy on use of Zinc
Sulphate
b. Gypsum/ Pyrite. |
33
Districts are deficient in Zinc and Sulphur,
hence use of Zinc Sulphate / Zypsum / Pyrite
is to be promoted. |
| 5 |
Plant
Protection :
Subsidy on Sprayers and Dusters
:
a.
Hand Operated
b.
Power operated
c.
Weedicide/Herbicide |
To
promote use of weedicides, insecticides and
fungicides.
Weed control through labour
is a major problem . To overcome this, it is
essential to provide incentive on weedicides
. |
| 6 |
Seed
Treatment :
a.
Seed Treating material
b. Seed Treating Drum |
It
is an important measure to protect crop from
seed borne diseases. |
| 7 |
Pipe
lines |
For
efficient water utilization |
| 8 |
Trainings
:
a.
State Level Workshop
b. Training
of trainers
c.
Training of extension workers
d. Training
of farmers |
For
effective transfer of technology to the farmers
& extension workers. |
| 9 |
Technology
Demonstration
a.
Field Demonstration
b.
Diversion of crops
c.
Popularization of intercrops
d.
Cultivation on bunds |
Intensive
farming for utilization of bunds and popularize
inter-cropping system for risk coverage |
| 10 |
Technology
Transfer
a. Lab
to Land & Land to Lab
b
Farmers visit
c.
Interface at Agro-climatic zones |
Problems
of field may be discussed face to face with
the scientists and solutions may be tested in
the field |
| 11 |
Contingencies
( POL) |
To
meet-out the cost of boards & POL etc. |
10.
JUSTIFICATIONS:
1. Under
this programme thrust will be on wheat. In Rabi,
wheat crop
covers approximately 45 lakh hectares of area in the
state, but, the productivity is
below the national average. Therefore this scheme
is proposed to enhance the
productivity of wheat and other Coarse cereal crops.
2. In
order to increase availability of certified quality
seeds, subsidy for
purchase of Breeder seed and incentive on production
of Foundation and
Certified seed is included in the programme. Subsidy
on distribution of certified
seed is also included in the programme
3. Low
cost production technologies, like use of Bio-fertilisers,
Micro-nutrients,
Seed treatment, Green Manuring, Integrated Nutrient
Management,
Inter-cropping etc.
are to be popularised through Technology Demonstrations.
4.To counter the Zinc and sulphurs deficiency,
subsidy is proposed on
use of Zinc Sulphate / Zypsum / Pyrite.
5. To
combat the pest and disease attack and reduce the
menace of weeds,
component of plant protection is included. To protect
seed from seed borne
disease and fungus, seed treatment component is also
included.
6. To
enhance irrigation facilities and to utilize maximum
irrigation potential,
distribution of pipe lines on subsidy basis has been
included in the programme.
7. State
level Workshop shall be held every year to have an
interface between
Research and Extension to assess and solve the field
problems. Training to
Trainers and Extension staff shall be imparted in
addition to farmers .
8. Technology
transfer from research to farmers and problem of farmers
to research,
farmers visit and interface at agro-climate level
has been included in the programme
9. Weeds
are the major problem of cereal crops in kharif as
well as Rabi crops,
hence subsidy on weedicide is proposed.
11
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI &
STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
370.00 |
41.11 |
411.11 |
PROPOSED
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS (ICDP-Coarse Cereal)
Physical
Targets & Financial Requirements 2003-04
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2003-04 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Purchase
of Breeder Seed |
Qtls. |
2000 |
1300 |
26.00 |
| 2 |
Incentives
on production of :
- Foundation Seed
- Certified Seed
|
Qtls.
Qtls. |
200
200 |
5200 |
10.40 |
| 3 |
Incentive
on distribution of certified seed / foundation
seeds |
Qtls. |
200 |
13600 |
27.20 |
| 4 |
Integrated
Nutrient Management
- Subsidy on use of Zinc Sulphate
- Zypsum/ Pyrite
|
Hect. |
25%
or 500
25%
or 500 |
7000
7000 |
35.00
35.00 |
| 5 |
Plant
Protection
- Subsidy on sprayers / dusters
:
-
-
Hand Operated
-
-
Power Operated
|
Nos
Nos
Hect. |
55%
or 600
25%
or 2000
25%
or 500 |
9000
3500
4180 |
54.00
70.00
20.90 |
| 6 |
Seed
Treatment :
- Seed Treating Material
- Seed Treating Drums
|
Hect.
Nos |
50
25%
or 500 |
15000
600 |
7.50
3.00 |
| 7 |
Sprinkler
Set/Pipe line/ rain gun
- SC/ST/S&M/Women farmers
- Others
|
Nos
Nos |
25%
or 7500
25%
or 5000 |
1000 |
50.95 |
| 8 |
Training
- State level Workshop
- Training of Trainers
- Training of staff
- Training of farmers
|
Nos |
50000
28000
20000
10000 |
2
16
60
313 |
1.00
3.92
12.00
31.30 |
| 9 |
Field
Demonstration:
- Field Demonstration
- Cultivation on bunds
- Diversification of crops
- Popularization of Inter cropping
|
Nos
Nos
Nos
Nos |
1000
100
60
30 |
1000
1790
750
9967 |
10.00
1.79
0.45
2.92 |
| 10 |
Technology
Transfer Lab to land & Land to Lab :
- Farmers Visit
- Interface at Agro-climatic
Zones
|
Nos
Nos |
50000
20000 |
4
4 |
2.00
0.80 |
| 11 |
Contingency |
District |
30000 |
45 |
13.50 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
411.11 |
|
GOI Share 90% |
|
|
|
370.00 |
|
State Share 10% |
|
|
|
41.11 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Sustainable Dev. Of Sugarcane |
| |
|
PROGRAMME
DETAILS
1. SCHEME CODE
: MP-A-03
2. PROGRAMME NAME : Sustainable
Development of Sugarcane
3. OBJECT OF PROGRAMME
: To increase Area, Production and
Productivity of Sugarcane.
4. PRESENT STATUS
: Area, Production and Productivity of
sugarcane
is as under(Prediction):
| YEAR |
AREA
in '000 Ha. |
Production
in '000 M.T. |
Productivity
in MT/ Ha. |
| 2002-03 |
49.00 |
2050 |
42-00 |
| 2003-04 |
52.00 |
2180 |
42-00 |
1.
6.
ANALYSIS OF LAST THREE
YEARS:
Rs. in lakh
| YEAR |
CENTRAL
SHARE |
EXPENDITURE |
| Previous
Balance |
Release |
Total
Amt. Available |
Central |
State |
Total |
| 2000-01 |
30.57 |
27.42 |
57.99 |
31.50 |
5.83 |
37.33 |
| 2001-02 |
0 |
81.00 |
81.00 |
63.00 |
7.00 |
70.00 |
| 2002-03* |
0 |
78.30 |
78.30 |
44.31 |
4.92 |
49.23 |
* Upto
Deceber 2002
6. AREA OF OPERATION
:
The programme will be implemented
in 28 sugarcane growing districts of Madhya Pradesh
as detailed under :-
1. Balaghat
2. Chhindwara
3. Narsinghpur
4. Indore
5. Dhar
6. Khargone
7. Badwani
8. Khandwa
9. Ujjain
10. Ratlam
11. Dewas
12. Shajapur
13. Morena
14. Sheopurkalan
15. Gwalior
16. Shivpuri
17. Guna
18. Datia
19. Bhopal
20. Sehore
21. Betul
22.Rajgarh
23. Hoshangabad
24. Harda
25. Neemuch
26.Mandsaur
27. Seoni
28. Satna
29.Mandla
30. Jabalpur
31. Vidisha
7. MAJOR CONSTRAINTS
:
(i)
Unavailability of improved sugarcane varieties.
(ii)
Lack of awareness of improved methods of sugarcane
cultivation
(iii)
Lack of suitable implements for sugarcane cultivation.
(iv)
Lack of timely adoption of Agronomical practices
(v)
Imbalanced use of nutrients.
8. INTERVENTIONS
:
1.
Financial support for seed production and distribution.
2.
Popularisation of Tissue culture planting materia/Poly
bag planting matarialsl.
3.
Propagation of Inter-cropping.
4.
Introduction of suitable farm implements, i.e.,
Sugarcane,Cutter Planter, Rotavator, Power Tiller,
Stubble saver, Ridger etc.
5. Training
support.
6.
To popularise the use of biological control for
insects , pests and diseases
9. PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
:
| S.No. |
COMPONENTS |
EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF NEW COMPONENT |
| 1 |
Subsidy
on production of improved seeds |
Financial
support to Govt. Farms & SAU's Research Farms
for production of new improved sugarcane varieties
. |
| 2 |
Subsidy
to the farmer for seed multiplication |
|
| 3 |
Subsidy
on purchase of seed |
To
provide financial assistance to the farmers for
purchase of seeds. |
| 4 |
Subsidy
on tissue culture plants |
Popularisation
of tissue culture |
| 5 |
Subsidy
on poly bag planting materials |
P.bag
planting material among the farmers |
| 6 |
Transport
subsidy on sugarcane seed |
Financial
support to bring new varieties of sugarcane seed. |
| 7 |
Propagation
of inter-cropping |
To
generate extra income to the sugarcane growing
farmers, inter-cropping of garlic onion and others
crops to be encouraged. |
| 8 |
Subsidy
on Seed Treating Material. |
Prevention
and control of seed borne diseases. |
| 9 |
Biological
control. |
Introduction
of use of Bilogical control method s. |
| 10 |
Subsidy
on Plant Protection Equipment:
a.
b.
Hand operated
b.
c.
Power operated |
For
easy and effective spraying / dusting of Plant
Protection chemicals |
| 11 |
Financial
assistance on use of Bio-fertilisers |
To
minimise use of chemical fertilisers |
| 12 |
Drip Irrigation system |
|
| 13. |
Financial support for training to staff |
|
| 14 |
Financial support for training to farmers |
|
| 15 |
Farmers study tours |
To
demonstrate latest technologies at different locations
through visits & study tours. |
| 16 |
Continge
Contingency |
|
10. JUSTIFICATIONS :
1.
A major programme for production and multiplication
of quality seed ensuring their availability to the farmers
shall be under-taken.
2.
Planting material produced through Tissue culture
shall be popularised among farmers.on the same time
low cost poly bag planting matarials shall also be popularised
3.
In sugarcane use of culture in the form of PSB,
Azatobactor and Azosprillium are widely accepted because
the use of these cultures promote the fertility of soil
and availability of Nitrogen naturally.
4.
Skill of farmers and Extension workers needs
improvement through continuous training and their visit
to other areas where advance technology are being adopted.
5.
Sugarcane is a perennial crop which is affected
by so many diseases and pests IPM is a major component
which is to be included in the programme. Looking to
its importance to maintain eco-balance and for economical
control of pests and diseases, the cultivators are to
be given incentives to use hand & power operated
Plant Protection equipment, Plant protection chemicals
and seed treating material.
6.
The sugarcane growing cultivators can be benefited
economically by taking inter-crops, therefore inter-cropping
is to be promoted.
7.
Besides the use of balanced fertilizers in soil
it is also essential to use Micro-nutrients in standing
crop as and when required to maintain soil and crop
health.
8.
Pyrilla is main insect-pest of sugarcane crop.
To control this insect-pest Apricania and Tricogamma
is found most suitable.
11
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI & STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
80.00 |
8.89 |
88.89 |
PROPOSED
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
(Sustainable
Development of Sugarcane)
Physical
Targets & Financial Requirements 2003-04
Rs.
in Lakh
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2003-04 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Subsidy
on production of improved Seed |
Hect. |
25000 |
7 |
1.75 |
| 2 |
Subsidy
to the farmers for seed multiplication |
Hect. |
2000 |
90 |
1.80 |
| 3 |
Subsidy
on purchase of seed |
Hect. |
2500 |
720 |
18.00 |
| 4 |
Subsidy
on Tissue Culture plants |
Nos. |
2 |
90000 |
1.80 |
| 5 |
Subsidy
on poly bag planting materials |
Nos. |
0.50 |
540000 |
2.70 |
| 6 |
Transport
subsidy on sugarcane seed |
Qtls. |
30
to 70 |
19040 |
9.02 |
| 7 |
Propagation
of inter-cropping |
0.5Hect. |
500 |
370 |
1.85 |
| 8 |
Subsidy
on Seed Treating Material |
Hect. |
100 |
1270 |
1.27 |
| 9 |
Biological
Control |
Hect. |
125 |
2070 |
2.52 |
| 10 |
Subsidy
on PP Equipment:
- Hand operated
- Power operated
|
Nos
Nos |
800
2000 |
625
400 |
5.00
8.00 |
| 11 |
Financial
Assistance on use of Bio-fertilizers |
Hect. |
75 |
1800 |
1.35 |
| 12 |
Drip
Irrigation system |
Nos. |
18200
or 26000 |
|
|
| 13 |
Training
& Tours :
- Training to staff
- Training to farmers
- Farmers Study Tours
|
Nos.
Nos.
Nos. |
28000
10000
50000 |
5
108
30 |
1.40
10.80
15.00 |
| 14 |
Contingency |
District |
30000 |
|
8.40 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
88.89 |
|
GOI Share 90% |
|
|
|
80.00 |
|
State Share 10% |
|
|
|
8.89 |

|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance and Integrated Use of Fertilizers
|
| |
PROGRAMME DETAILS
1. SCHEME CODE
: MP-A-04
2. PROGRAMME NAME
: Balanced and Integrated Use Of Fertilizers (BIUS).
3. OBJECTS OF PROGRAMME
:
1. To promote the
balanced & Integrated use of fertilizers.
2. To
ensure effective quality control of fertilizers.
3.
To assess the availability of micronutrients in the
soil.
4.
On the basis of analysis of micronutrient availability
in the soil, adoption of promotional activities for application
of micronutrient in the soil.
4. PRESENT STATUS:-
a. Use of fertilizers in
terms of nutrients in M.P. is N 29.21, P 15.75 & K 2.17
Kgs per hectare (1997-98) . It is evident from the figures
that consumption of 'K' is very poor as compared to 'N' &
'P' .According to studies and experience it is found that due
to less use of 'K', the productivity of crop is not increasing
at desired level. The crop like Soybean, Paddy and Groundnut
are giving very good response to zinc,sulphur and rock phosphate
etc. This indicates that special emphasis is to be given for
promotion of balanced use of fertilizer and also use of micronutrients.
b. The
consumption of fertilizer particularly mixture and complexes
is increasing very fast. The Quality control facilities are
very limited in the state . There are only five quality control
labs in the state. Soil testing facilities are also insufficient.
Strengthening of existing soil testing facilities and fertilizer
testing , as well as creation of the facilities for analysis
of micronutrients in the soil has become necessary.
ANALYSIS OF LAST THREE YEARS:
Rs. in lakh
| YEAR |
CENTRAL
SHARE |
EXPENDITURE |
| Previous
Balance |
Release |
Total
Amt. Available |
Central |
State |
Total |
| 2000-01 |
- |
34.79- |
34.79 |
8.52 |
0.15 |
8.67 |
| 2001-02 |
0 |
40.50 |
40.50 |
32.59 |
3.62 |
36.21 |
| 2002-03* |
0 |
48.90 |
48.90 |
31.15 |
3.46 |
34.61 |
* upto Deceber 2002
5. AREA OF OPERATION
:- All 45 districts .
6. MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN
:-
1.
Promotion of balanced and integrated use of fertilizers.
2. Insufficient quality
control facilities for fertilizers and Micro-nutrients.
7
INTERVENTIONS :
1. Strengthening of existing laboratories.
2. Training Programs.
5
PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENTS.
| S.No. |
COMPONENTS |
EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF NEW COMPONENT |
| 1 |
Strengthening
the existing fertilizer testing laboratories. |
To
facilitate the laboratories for purchase of required chemicals,
glass-ware and equipment for efficient working |
| 2 |
Strengthening
the existing soil testing laboratories. |
To
make available the required chemicals , glass-ware and
equipment for efficient working as well as quick analysis
of samples. |
| 3 |
Scheduling
large training program for quality control, compost making,
use of biomas, use of fertilizer and soil testing. |
|
10. JUSTIFICATION :
1. At present we
have four fertiliser testing laboratories analyzing approximately
8000 fertilizer samples every year. The state had consumed
about 32-35 lakh tons of fertilizer in the year 1998-99. The
share of one fertilizer testing Laboratory on consumption basis
comes to about 6.00 lakh tones of fertilizer. The fertilizer
consumption in coming years is expected to increase by 25%.
For proper & effective quality control the efficiency of
the quality control laboratory is proposed to be increased by
facilitating them with supply of chemicals, glassware's and
other necessary equipment's in the sufficient quantities.
2.
Quality control training program for extension workers as well
for dealers and farmers is a prime requirement of the day.
Effective training program once a year in each district is
proposed to be organised.
11
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI & STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
50.00 |
5.56 |
55.56 |
PROPOSED PROGRAMME
COMPONENTS
(Balanced &
Integrated Use of Fertilizers)
Physical Targets
& financial Requirements 2003-04
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2003-04 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Strengthening
of Fertilizer Testing Lab :
- Purchase of Chemicals, Glass-wares
- Maintenance of Equipment
- Purchase of Equipment
- Power Generation Set 9KVA
|
Nos. |
100000
50000
100000
45000 |
4
4
4
2 |
4.00
2.00
4.00
0.90 |
| 2 |
Strengthening
of soil Testing Lab:
- Purchase of Chemicals, Glass-wares
- Purchase of Equipment
- Soil Preparation
- Maintenance of Equipment
- Distribution of Soil Testing Kits to staff
- Power Generating Sets 9 KVA
|
Nos. |
50000
1500000
50000
50000
15000
45000 |
23
1
20
10
5
1 |
11.50
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.75
0.45 |
| 3 |
Soil
Testing & Fertilizer Quality Control Training |
Nos. |
5000 |
45 |
2.26 |
| Total |
|
|
|
55.56 |
| GOI
Share 90% |
|
|
|
50.00 |
| State
Share 10% |
|
|
|
5.56 |

|
| |
|
| |
Integrated
Pest Management |
| |
PROGRAMME DETAILS
1. SCHEME CODE :
MP-A-05
2. PROGRAMME NAME : Integrated
Pest Management (IPM)
3. OBJECT OF PROGRAMME :
1. Checking
of the indiscriminate use of Pesticides which causes ecological
and environmental degradation.
2. Effective
Quality Control of Pesticides .
3. Promotion
of Bio-pesticides
4. To promote use
of safer Pesticides
5. To conserve
naturalparasites and predators
6. Promotion of Light
trapasmechanical tool for insect pest control.
4.
PRESENT STATUS :
1. At present Department
of Agriculture is continuously advocating the judicious use
of pesticides so that indiscriminate use of pesticides can be
checked.
2.
Training and demonstration is continuously given to the
Extension staff and the farmers for promotion of judicious use
of pesticides and insecticides.
5. ANALYSIS
OF LAST THREE YEARS:
| YEAR |
CENTRAL
SHARE |
EXPENDITURE |
| Previous
Balance |
Release |
Total
Amt. Available |
Central |
State |
Total |
| 2000-01 |
- |
12.60 |
12.60 |
12.11 |
1.34 |
13.45 |
| 2001-02 |
- |
90.00 |
90.00 |
74.62 |
8.29 |
82.91 |
| 2002.03* |
- |
132.00 |
132.00 |
93.95 |
10.44 |
104.39 |
* Expenditure
upto Dec. 2002.
6. AREA OF
OPERATION : All 45 districts of the State.
7.
MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN :
Insufficient training facilities and IPM demonstrations
Lack of knowledge regarding natural control of pest & diseases
8. INTERVENTIONS :
1. Promotion
of IPM as State wide campaign.
2. Re-structuring
the training facilities to the extension workers & farmers
for IPM.
9.
PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENTS :
| S.No. |
COMPONENTS |
EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF NEW COMPONENT |
| 1 |
IPM training
a.
a.
TrainersTraining
b.
b.
Extension Workers Training
c. Farmers Training |
Encouragement for integrated use of inputs and
other practices under
IPM and Checking indiscriminate use of pesticides
which causes ecological and environmental degradation
along-with effective quality control of insecticides
& pesticides |
| 2 |
Strengthening of pesticide Lab IIIIdfddddinclude
chemical & glass ware |
| 3 |
Literature/Extension/Electronic Media |
| 4 |
IPM Demonstrations
·
·
Crop Demonstration
·
·
Machnical Process
Demo(Light Trap) |
| 5 |
IPM Demonstration cum Training |
| 6 |
Subsidy on Bio-pesticides/agents |
| 7 |
Cost of pesticides samples |
| 8 |
Strengthning of bio Lab. |
|
| 9 |
State lavel workshop |
|
10
JUSTIFICATIONS :
1.
Encouragement of
judicious and integrated use of agricultural inputs and other
practices under IPM.
2.
IPM Training :
1. Under
this scheme there will be emphasis on training on IPM to trainers,extension
workers as well as to the farmers.
2. Publicity
would be on top of the agenda to appraise the farmers timely
about advent of pests and insects.
11
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI & STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
134.00 |
14.89 |
148.89 |
PROPOSED PROGRAMME
COMPONENTS
(Integrated Pest
Management)
Physical Targets
& Financial Requirements 2003-04
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2003-04 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
IPM Training
:
- Trainers Training
- Extension Workers Training
- Farmers Training
|
Nos. |
28000
28000
6000 |
7
45
313 |
1.96
12.60
18.78 |
| 2 |
IPM Demonstration:
- Crop Demonstration
- Mechanical Process Demo (Light Trap)
|
Hect
Nos. |
1500
600 |
1200
1250 |
18.00
7.50 |
| 3 |
IPM Demonstration
cum Training |
Nos. |
6000 |
626 |
37.56 |
| 4 |
Subsidy on Bio-pesticides
/ agents |
Hect. |
500 |
5000 |
25.00 |
| 5 |
Cost of Pesticides
samples |
Nos. |
|
|
7.10 |
| 6 |
Strengthening
of Bio-Lab |
Nos. |
|
|
5.00 |
| 7 |
Strengthening
of Pesticide Labinclude chemical & glass ware |
Nos. |
|
|
10.00 |
| 8 |
Literature/Extension/Electronic
Media |
|
|
|
5.00 |
| 9 |
State lavel
workshop |
Nos |
50000 |
1 |
0.50 |
| Total |
|
|
|
149.00 |
| GOI
Share 90% |
|
|
|
134.00 |
| State
Share 10% |
|
|
|
14.89 |

|
| |
|
| |
Farm Mechanization Program |
| |
PROGRAMME DETAILS
1. SCHEME CODE
: MP-A-08
2. PROGRAMME NAME :
Promotion Of Farm
Mechanisation In Madhya Pradesh
3. OBJECT OF PROGRAMME : To
promote Farm Mechanisation Work
in M.P.
4. PRESENT STATUS
:
1.
The growth of use of improved agricultural implement
is less amongst small farmers
2. Popularisation
of pow er
drawn equipment in the state is much less in comparison to other
states.
3.
Tractor density in the state is far below the national
average as well as to other states.
4.
Farm power availability in the state is far below the
national average.
5.
5. ANALYSIS
FOR LAST THREE YEARS :
| YEAR |
CENTRAL
SHARE |
EXPENDITURE |
| Previous
Balance |
Release |
Total
Amt. Available |
Central |
State |
Total |
| 2000-01 |
0.00 |
186.98 |
186.98 |
173.07 |
15.86 |
188.93 |
| 2001-02 |
0.00 |
495.00 |
495.00 |
431.21 |
47.92 |
479.16 |
| 2002-03 |
0.00 |
560.82 |
560.82 |
461.03 |
51.23 |
512.26 |
·
· Expenditure upto Dec.
2002
6.
6.
AREA OF OPERATION : All the 45 districts
of the state.
7. MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN :
Use of conventional and traditional implements.
Many farmers are reluctant of using improved equipments.
Agricultural labour is not available for seasonal operations
due to industrial developments and demands very high and unjustified
wages.
8 INTERVENTIONS :
1. Replacement of conventional
and traditional implements.
2.
To discourage the use of timber in manufacturing of agricultural
implements and to promote the use of alternative materials.
3.
To reduce the physical labour and drudgery.
4.
To reduce the losses in different agricultural operations.
5.
To encourage the efficient and judicious use of seeds,
fertilisers and insecticides etc.
6.
To complete different farm operations efficiently in
comparatively less time with
lower investment.
9. PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENTS :
| S.No. |
COMPONENT |
EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF COMPONENT |
| 1 |
Distribution of
Improved agricultural
bullock-drawn implements and hand
tools. |
For
effective monitoring and implementation, there should
be only
one scheme against the present
approach through a component in
various schemes |
| 2 |
Distribution of
Power Tiller and Power operated improved agricultural
equipment |
| 3 |
Distribution of
tractors upto 35 HP |
10. JUSTIFICATION :
By using improved agricultural
implements productivity can increase by 15 to 20%.Further it
saves labour, time and money.Reducing man-hours and enhancing
the power availability per hectare.Accrual of additional income
by custom hiring of tractors and high value equipment.
11
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI & STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
500.00 |
55.56 |
555.56 |
12. PROPOSED PROGRAMME
COMPONENTS
(Farm Mechanization)
Physical Targets
& Financial Requirements 2003-04
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2003-04 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Improved Bullock
Drawn Implements & Hand Tools |
Nos. |
25%of
the cost |
100000 |
50.56 |
| 2 |
Power Tiller &
Power Operated improved equipment Post Harvest Equipment |
Nos. |
25%of
the cost |
5000 |
85.00 |
| 3 |
Tractor up to
35 HP |
Nos. |
30000 |
1400 |
420.00 |
| Total |
|
|
|
555.56 |
| GOI
Share 90% |
|
|
|
500.00 |
| State
Share 10% |
|
|
|
55.56 |

|
| |
|
| |
Production
of High Yielding and Quality Seeds |
| |
PROGRAMME
DETAILS
1. SCHEME CODE
: MP-A-09
2. PROGRAMME NAME
: Production Of Quality And High Yielding Seeds
3. OBJECTS OF PROGRAMME :
1.
Production and
multiplication of High Yielding and quality seeds in
sufficient quantity.
2. Meeting the
requirements of Breeder, Foundation & Certified seeds.
3. Infra-structural
development of
selected Farms in every year right from the year 2000-01 &
subsequently in 2001-2002.
4.Establishment of Revolving Fund
5. Production of seed,
launching new programmes through Seed Village Schemes.
PRESENT STATUS :
Crop-wise area, requirement of seed, seed distribution
along-with replacement rate is
given in the table below :
| S.No. |
CROP |
TOTAL
AREA
Lakh Hec. |
SEED
RATE Kgs/Ha |
REQUIRE-
MENT
In lakh Qtls |
DISTRI-
BUTION
Lakh Qtls. |
SRR in % |
| KHARIF : |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
Paddy |
16.86 |
50 |
8.43 |
1.37 |
1.17 |
| 2 |
Maize |
8.15 |
15 |
1.35 |
0.05 |
3.70 |
| 3 |
Jowar |
8.26 |
15 |
1.27 |
0.075 |
5.88 |
| 4 |
Bajra |
1.48 |
5 |
0.07 |
0.008 |
12.00 |
| 5 |
Urd |
4.44 |
15 |
0.75 |
0.017 |
2.33 |
| 6 |
Moong |
1.05 |
15 |
0.21 |
0.015 |
7.14 |
| 7 |
Arhar |
3.37 |
15 |
0.675 |
0.03 |
4.44 |
| 8 |
Til |
2.10 |
5 |
0.105 |
0.003 |
2.86 |
| 9 |
Niger |
2.10 |
10 |
0.21 |
0.002 |
1.90 |
| 10 |
Sunflower |
0.20 |
25 |
0.05 |
0.0015 |
3.00 |
| 11 |
Groundnut |
1.00 |
100 |
2.50 |
0.02 |
0.53 |
| 12 |
Soybean |
47.25 |
75 |
33.00 |
2.75 |
8.33 |
| 13 |
Cotton Hy |
2.50 |
2.50 |
0.0625 |
0.03 |
100 |
| 14 |
Cotton Imp |
3.00 |
10 |
0.30 |
0.02 |
6.67 |
| |
TOTAL |
137.7 |
|
67.0525 |
4.3915 |
6.5 |
| RABI : |
| 1 |
Wheat |
48.73 |
100 |
48.50 |
2.50 |
5.88 |
| 2 |
Gram |
26.13 |
80 |
21.60 |
0.40 |
1.85 |
| 3 |
Pea |
2.00 |
80 |
1.60 |
0.042 |
2.63 |
| 4 |
Lentil |
5.00 |
30 |
1.50 |
0.025 |
1.67 |
| 5 |
Mustard/Toria |
8.50 |
5 |
0.425 |
0.041 |
9.64 |
| 6 |
Linseed |
4.30 |
25 |
1.07 |
0.026 |
2.42 |
| 7 |
Sunflower |
0.10 |
20 |
0.02 |
0.005 |
25.00 |
| 8 |
Safflower |
0.30 |
20 |
0.06 |
0.021 |
35.00 |
| |
TOTAL |
89.7 |
|
68.775 |
3.06 |
4.45 |
| GRAND TOTAL |
227.40 |
|
135.82 |
7.45 |
5.48 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is evident from the above table that the
Seed Replacement Rate
in the state is much below the to prescribed level.
6.
6.
ANALYSIS OF LAST TWO YEARS:
| YEAR |
CENTRAL
SHARE |
EXPENDITURE |
|
| Previous
Balance |
Release |
Total
Amt. Available |
Central |
State |
Total |
|
| 2000-2001 |
- |
26.14 |
26.14 |
26.18 |
2.91 |
29.09 |
| 2001-2002* |
- |
148.50 |
148.50 |
49.18 |
5.46 |
54.64 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* upto Dec.2002
6. AREA OF OPERATION
: All 45 districts of the state.
7. MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN :
Paucity of quality seeds of cereals, pulses & oilseeds.
8. INTERVENTIONS :
1.
Infra-structural development of existing Farms
2. Upgrading the existing seed testing laboratory & establishing
new laboratories.
3. Creation of Revolving Fund in Govt. Farms.
9. PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENTS :
| S.No. |
COMPONENT |
EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF COMPONENT |
| 1 |
Infra-structural
Development of
Farms |
To ease the quality
seed availability to the farmers |
| 2 |
Revolving fund
for selected Govt.
Farms |
Monitory arrangement
for farmers seed production programme under fourth
channel of seed production |
| 3 |
Strengthening
of Seed Testing
Laboratory |
Number of seed
samples are exceeding
due to increasing seed production &
supply programme. It is necessary to strengthen
Seed Testing Lab. |
| 4 |
Etablishment
of New Seed Testing Laboratories |
At present there
is only one STL under
Govt. control with limited capacity of
3000 samples per annum. This compels to
establish one more laboratory for seed testing. |
10. JUSTIFICATION :
·
· Selected
Agriculture farms are being taken during 2001-02 for infra-structural
development of 15 Govt. agricultural farms under seed production
plan. Rs.150.00 lakh have been proposed for the purpose.
·
· Seed
production programme on model Govt. farms : For enhancing Foundation
seed Prod. on 11 Farms provision of Rs. 110.00 lakh have been
made .
·
· Strengthening
of Seed Testing Laboratories: For strengthening of one Seed
Testing Lab.a provision of 30.00 lakh have been made for the
year 2001-02
·
· Establishment
of new seed testing laboratory : Existing one laboratory is
unable to cope-up with the increasing load of seed samples for
testing. As such one more Seed Testing Lab. is proposed to be
established.
11
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI & STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
90.00 |
10.00 |
100.00 |
PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
(Production of High Yielding and Quality Seeds)
Physical Targets & Financial Requirements 2003-04
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2003-04 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Infra-structural
Development of selected Farms |
No.of
Farms. |
|
15 |
50.00 |
| 2 |
Seed Production
Programme |
Do |
|
13 |
35.00 |
| 3 |
Strengthening
of Seed Testing Lab |
Do |
|
1 |
5.00 |
| 4 |
Establishment
of New Seed Testing Lab |
do |
|
1 |
10.00 |
| Total |
|
|
|
100.00 |
| GOI
Share 90% |
|
|
|
90.00 |
| State
Share 10% |
|
|
|
10.00 |

|
| |
|
| |
Dev. Of Organic and Sustainable Agriculture
|
| |
PROGRAMME DETAILS
1. SCHEME
CODE : MP-A-10
2. PROGRAMME
NAME : Development Of Organic & Sustainable
Agriculture
(DOSA)
3. OBJECTS
OF THE PROGRAMME :
1. To promote the use of bio-fertilizer.
2. To promote Green manuring practices
amongst farmers to maintain humus and fertility in the soil.
3. To
educate farmers for use of bio-fertilizer, production of quality
compost , Farm Yard Manure (FYM) and use of biomas for
making compost.
4. To popularize use of biogas slurry.
5. To
prpare phasphorusenriched compost using rock phaosphate.
6.
Recyling of bio massthrough NADEP method of composting
7.
Establisment of vermi compsting unite to produce vermicomposting
4
PRESENT STATUS :
Implementation
of this scheme started in year 2001-02 under the guidance and
supervision of a team of expeert comprising scient environmentalist
and food management personals in 939 bio villages selected from
313 blocks of 45 dustructs in the state.Organic farming is in
progress on Govt. farm on 50% area of total cultivable land.
5. ANALYSIS OF LAST TWO YEARS:
.
| Year |
CENTRAL
SHARE |
EXPENDITURE |
| Previous
Balance |
Release |
Total
Amt. Available |
Central |
State |
Total |
| 2001-02 |
0.00 |
363.16 |
363.16 |
117.92 |
13.10 |
131.02 |
| 2002-03* |
0.00 |
363.16 |
363.16 |
162.91 |
18.10 |
181.01 |
·
·
upto Dec.2002
6. AREA OF OPERATION
:- All 45 districts of the state.
7. MAJOR AREAS
OF CONCERN :-
1. Now
the time has come to improve humus availability in the soil.
Green manuring, blue green algae use of cow-dung manure, prearation
and use of NADEP phospho compost, and vermicompost are the main
source of organic manure farming. These practices are to be
popularised on mass scale.
8. INTERVENTIONS :-
1. Promotion of biofertilizer.
2. Use of biomas
for production of compost.
3.
Training on organic farming.
4 Production of vermicompost
and its use
9.
PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENTS :
| S.No. |
COMPONENT |
EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF COMPONENT |
| 1 |
Setting-up
BGA units |
To
produce mother culture of BGA for on-ward distribution
to farmers |
| 2 |
Subsidy
for production of BGA mother culture |
To
strengthen the production unit for regular supply of mother
culture |
| 3 |
Distribution
subsidy |
To
facilitate the farmers for purchase of mother culture |
| 4 |
Production
of Green Manure seed |
To
make available the Green Manuring seed to the farmers |
| 5 |
Distribution
of Green Manure seed on subsidy |
To
facilitate the farmers for purchase of Green Manure seed |
| 6 |
Training
Programme |
To
educate the farmers for better use of organic farming
technology and also to train them for quality production
of /farm Yard Manure, NADEP compost and how to use BGA
for production of Paddy crop. |
| 7. |
Nadep
Phospho compost pits |
To
prepare phosphours enriched compost using rock phosphate. |
| 8. |
Vermi
composting |
To
produce good quality compost through verms with in short
time & lowest cost. |
| 9. |
Subsidy
on Demonstration |
To
popularized organic farming practices. |
| 10. |
Training
& workshops State level workshop Divisional level
workshop Assistance to NGO's National Seinar/workshop
-
-
|
To
trained the extension officers & workers. |
| 11. |
Literature
Extension Electronic Media |
For
quick execution the electronic Media is essentital for
extension of the scheme. |
| 12. |
Bio
demonstration cum training unit |
To
demonstrate modern technology of organic farming and to
trained the farmers through demonstration. |
| 13. |
Research
& development through krishi vikas kendra. |
Research
on organic farming through K.V.K. |
10. JUSTIFICATION
:
(i)
The requirement of biofertilizer is much more than what sis
being done. That is why the state need to promote the use of
Bio-fertilizer in coming years.
(ii)
The humus content of the soil is deteriorating day by day.
Humus is the main component of the soil responsible for increasing
water retention capacity of the soil , as well as it facilitates
the availability of nutrients and micro-nutrients from the soil
to the plants. Green manuring is one main practice which can
increase the humus in the soil considerably. Green manuring
practice have reduced during last few decades. The availabilityof
green manuring seed has also become a problem. It is necessary
to build an atmosphere for promoting green manuring practices,
which necessitates to develop facilities for supply of green
manuring seeds.
(iii)
Farmers are already making rural compost, farm yard manure and
cow-dung manure. Technical know how is required to be transferred
to the farmers for preparing quality compost and farm yard manure. Almost
all biomas available in the nature is going waste and is not
being utilized for any purpose. Good quality compost can
be made out of this biomas by popularising NADEP method of making
compost in rural areas. A large scale training program is required
for the extension workers as well as for the farmers for this
purpose.
(iv) Blue
Green Algae (BGA) is an important source of nitrogen fixation
aerobically as well as an-aerobically. It is very effective
in paddy fields. The state has area of about 1.80 million hectares
under paddy crop. The productivity is about 850 Kgs per hectare.
For boosting-up the productivity of paddy we need to have effective
Nitrogen fixation agent. Blue Green Algae production program
is proposed to be taken up in paddy growing area of the state.
It is proposed to establish TWO BGA units in the state.
(vi
Extension Workers and the farmers in the state are
to be trained for effective implementation of the programs on
Organic farming.It is proposed to organize two training programs
each year, one before Kharif and one before Rabi on compost
making , use of biogas slurry ,NADEP , BGA and Vermi-culture
in each district. each training program would entail an expenditure
of approximately Rs. 5000/-.
v.
Extension Workers and the farmers in the state are to be
trained for effective implementation of the programs on Organic
farming. It is proposed to organize two training programs each
year, one before kharif and one before Rabi on aompost making,
use of biogas slurry NADEP, BGA and Vermi-culture in each district
each training program would entail an expenditure of approximately
Rs. 6000/-.
11
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI & STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
263.00 |
29.22 |
292.22 |
PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
(Development of Organic & Sustainable Agriculture)
Physical Targets & Financial Requirements 2003-04
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2003-04 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Setting-up
BGA Units |
Nos. |
150000 |
4 |
6.00 |
| 2 |
Subsidy
on mother culture of BGA |
Qtls. |
10000 |
8 |
0.80 |
| 3 |
Subsidy
on soil based BGA culture |
Qtls. |
1000 |
750 |
7.50 |
| 4 |
Subsidy
on production of Green Manure seeds |
Qtls. |
500 |
1500 |
7.50 |
| 5 |
Subsidy
on distribution of Green Manure seeds |
Qtls. |
500 |
10000 |
50.00 |
| 6 |
Training
Programme for Organic Farming system |
Nos |
6000 |
9052 |
75.12 |
| 7 |
Phospho-compost
pits |
Nos. |
200 |
18000 |
36.00 |
| 8 |
Vermi
Composting |
Nos. |
500 |
13000 |
65.00 |
| 9 |
Subsidy
on Demonstration |
Nos. |
500 |
3500 |
17.00 |
| 10 |
Training
& Workshops:
- State level Workshop
- Divisional level workshop
- Trainers Training Assistance to NGA's
- National Seminar/workshop
|
Nos.
Nos.
Nos. |
50000
50000
5000 |
2
10
1 |
1.00
5.00
4.30
5.00 |
| 11 |
Literature ,Extension,Electronic
Media |
No's |
|
|
10.00 |
| 12 |
Bio demonstration
cum training unit |
|
|
|
8.00 |
| 13 |
Research &
development through krishi vikas kendra |
|
|
|
4.00 |
| Total |
|
|
|
292.22 |
| GOI
Share 90% |
|
|
|
263.00 |
| State
Share 10% |
|
|
|
29.22 |

|
| |
|
| |
Agri.Ext.Training and Communication Support |
| |
PROGRAMME
DETAILS
1. SCHEME CODE
: MP-A-11
2. PROGRAMME NAME
: Agriculture Extension
Training and Publicity Support
Programme
3. OBJECTIVE OF
PROGRAMME :
To strengthen and re-organise Training
and Extension system of the state.
4. PRESENT
STATUS
Madhya Pradesh is
comprises of 45 district which are further divided in to 313
blocks. The total cultivated area of the state is 151.30 Lakh
hectare. The total No. of farm holding are 66.37 Lakh. Department
of Agriculture has presently 5 Agriculture Extension Training
Centers, 10 farmers Training Centers, 1 couple farmerstraining
centers 2 soil conservation training centers and 1 plant protection
training center. Out of these 19 training centers, only one
at Ujjiain is recently sanctioned during the year 1997-98 and
its establishment is under process. Rest all 18 centers are
in dilapidated condition being at least 25-30 years old. Out
of these 18 centers, only 8 centers are being utilized for on
campus trainings other 10 are only being used for off campus
training due to lack of basic infrastructure and hostel facilities.There is a uttermost essential need to develop &
strengthen these training centers as a well equipped with training
assets in the state.
5. ANALYSIS
OF LAST THREE YEARS
The year 2000-2001
was the first year of this scheme under Macro Management Plan.
Since it could only be started at the fag end of financial year
for want of clearance and release from GOI, the total planned
component of the scheme could not be implemented. The
details of work done during the year are, 2 trainer's training
programme, 5 out of the state staff visits, 7 with-in the state
farmers visits. Extensive visits could be made by the extension
staff at Block, District and Zonal level since funds for transportation
was supplemented by the scheme. Along with this 10 training
centers have been equipped with computers, software, printers,
modem along with 2 set at state H.Q.
5.
AREA OF OPERATION : All
45 districts of Madhya Pradesh
6.
MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN :
1.Owing to the lack
of financial resources the existing training centers are in
a dilapidated condition. They even lack the basic training
infrastructure.
2.
State has no financial resources to support the training
programme for faculty members, extension workers and farmers.
3.
Looking to the size of the state the existing training
centers are not in position to cater the training needs of the
state. It is felt that there should be at least one training
centers in each district.
4.
The existing centers are lacking in modern training equipment,
books, periodicals, training materials, furniture, Over-head
Projectors, VCR, TV and Publicity Vans etc. owing to resource
crunch.
8. INTERVENTIONS
1. Strengthening and
up gradation of existing 19 Training Centers.
2.
Preparation of extension and training material for effective
delivery of extension messages.
3.
Mobility of publicity and extension media.
4.
Organization of Exhibitions and Krishak Sammelans for
demonstration of latest technologies among farmers.
5.
Equipping the new State level Training Institute at Bhopal.
6.
Exposure of extension workers and farmers to improve
their skills by conducting study tours within and outside state.
7.
Strengthening the existing departmental Printing Press
at Bhopal for regular publication of programme promotional and
training literature.
8.
Strengthening of 7 Printing Presses at each of 7 Agro-Climatic
Zonal Offices.
9. Use
of electronic media including preparation of Video films and
their display at block and village levels.
9.. PROPOSED
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS :
| S.NO |
PROGRAMME COMPONENT |
EXPLANATION IN SUPPORT OF COMPONENT |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
| 1. |
Establishment of State level Agri. Extn. & Training Institute. |
State
Level Agri. Extn. and Training Institute has to be started
in departmental building at Bhopal during the year 2002-03.
It was planned from 2000-01 but due to some administrative
problems this could not be done during 2000-01. This
Institute is to be well furnished and equipped with latest
audio visual equipments during the year 2002-03. |
| 2. |
Upgradation of existing Training Centres. |
There
are 19 training centres in the department out of which
one is sanctioned only 2-3 years back. These training
centres are to be equiped with latest audio visual euipment
along with other furniture and materials. 10 training
centres have been equiped with computers last year and
remaining would be done this year. The total programme
has been phased for 3-4 years. |
| 3. |
Upgradation, development and strengthening of Infrastructure of demonstration
farm situated on or near the Training Centres. |
During
the training courses practical training is generally imparted
on demonstration farms situated on or near by one training
centres. These demonstration farms are not being maintained
properly for want of funds. There fore it is proposed
to take up these farms along with demonstration in MMP. |
| 4. |
Strengthening of departmental press |
The
department press buildings are very old building need
renovation for proper utilisation. Along with this these
press are to be equiped with latest machines and computers.
Therefore this comments has been taken in MMP to be completed
in phased manner. |
| 5. |
Communication and mobility of extension functionery. |
Frequent
visit and close contact with farmers is essential for
extension staff. Due to non availability of vehicle at
very place and lack of funds for POL the visit to actual
field are badly effected. Therefore attangement of hireing
of vehicle & POL has been made in MMP |
| 6. |
Training to Extension functionaries and staff |
For
getting effective impact of extension efforts. It is
desired to train the field staff, so that they can train
the farmers along with farmers training. Provision of
training in MMP will facilitate the farmers and staff
to update their knowledge. |
| 7. |
Study tours and Visits. |
Study
tours ( within & outside the state.) of farmers and
staff in group are proposed. These visit will give exposure
to farmers and staff regarding latest technology development. |
| 8. |
Exhibition and Krishak Sammelans |
Periodical
exhibition and Krishak Sammelans are proposed for the
exposure of farmers to latest agricultural technological
development. |
| 9. |
Opening of New district level Training Centers. |
Looking
to the size of the State 19 training centers are insufficient
to impart training to farmers and field functionary.
Therefore it is planned to open one training center in
each district in a phased manner. GOI is requested to
provide for development.works Building and establishment
expenditure would be provided by the state. |
| 10. |
Preparation and up gradation of Training materials. |
Preparation
and development of training material in the shape of video
films, charts, audio cassettes is of prime importance
for imparting effective training. Therefore all such materials
shall be developed and distributed to all training centers.
|
10. JUSTIFICATION:
1.
The existing training centers lack sufficient lodging
and boarding facilities, literature ,audio visual aids and other
modern training facilities. These facilities are required to
be created.
2.
For efficient training exhibitions and Krishak sammelans,
publicity vans equipped with TV / VCR and other publicity materials
are required.
3.
Looking to the dilapidated condition of existing
19 centers they need renovation and up-gradation with basic
facilities.
4.
State has established a State level Extension and
Training Institute at Bhopal. This Institute is to be equipped
in such a manner that it becomes the hub of the agriculture
extension training in the state.
5.
State has one printing press at Bhopal and 7 at divisional
head-quarters. These presses are in a good condition state.
For bringing out training publication etc. these presses needs
renovation, up-gradation and modernization.
6.
Preparation / up-gradation of training material
for imparting effective training and transfer of technologies
to the staff and farmers.
7.
It is essential to organise farmers fares and sammelans
for dessemination of modern technologies to the farmers. Financial
support is needed for this activity.
8.
Tours and visits of extension workers and farmers
is essential activity for the transfer of technologies.
11
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI & STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
200.00 |
22.22 |
222.22 |
PROPOSED PROGRAMME
COMPONENTS
(Agriculture Extension Training & Publicity support
Programme)
Physical Targets & Financial Requirements 2002-03
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2003-04 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Establishment
of State Level Agriculture Extension & Training Institute
:
- Additional furniture, Audio-Video equipment, books,
periodicals etc.
- Renovation / Maintenance of buildings
- Auditorium & furnishings
- Ladies Hostel construction & furnishing
- Campus renovation
|
Nos
Nos. |
|
1
1
0
0
1 |
2.00
5.00
0
0
2.00 |
| 2 |
Up-gradation of
existing Training Centres:
- Audio-visual equipment
- Hostel Furnishing
- LCD, Computers,Printers, TV / VCR etc
- Renovation / Maintenance of buildings wherever necessary
including construction of Hostels etc.
- construction of new training centers
- construction of new hostel
- Rent & contingency fund for training center
- Furniture, Books, Periodicals etc.
|
Nos.
Nos. |
|
20
20
2
10
19
2
2
8
20 |
37.00
20.00
10.00
30.00
32.25
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00 |
| 3 |
Up-gradation,
development & strengthening of infra-structure of
Demonstration Farms situated on, or, nearby the district
level Training Centre |
Nos. |
|
19 |
19.00 |
| 4 |
Strengthening
of departmental Press :
- Renovation & Up-gradation of Press buildings
- New Off-set Printing Machine along with Computer set
for State level Press
|
Nos.
Nos. |
|
7
7 |
7.00
14.00 |
| 5 |
Communication
and mobility of extension machinery, Hire charges / POL
of vehicles for:
- Zonal Offices
- Training Centres
- Depty directore Agri.
- Block level Extension staff
|
Year
Year
Year |
20000
20000 |
7
20
45
313 |
1.40
2.00
9.00
44.82 |
| 6 |
Training :
- Farmers Training
- Trainer's training programme
|
Nos.
Nos. |
10000
42000 |
45
7 |
4.50
2.94 |
| 7 |
Study Tours /
Visits :
a. Farmers visit :
- Within State
- Out of State
b Staff visit out of state :
- Extension functionaries / Officers
|
Nos.
Nos.
Nos. |
48000
50000
46000 |
7
7
3 |
3.36
3.50
1.38 |
| 8 |
Exhibitions &
Krashak Sammelans :
- Exhibition / Mela
- Krashak Sammelan
|
Nos.
Nos. |
30000
10000 |
7
7 |
2.10
0.70 |
| 9 |
Opening of new
district level training centre |
Nos. |
800000 |
2 |
4.92 |
| 10 |
Training Equipment |
|
|
|
|
| |
at the lavel of
training center |
|
|
20 |
10.00 |
| 11 |
Rabi/Khrif workshop
on Agri Inputs |
|
|
14 |
5.60 |
| 12 |
Organise of Agri.
Fortnight |
|
|
45 |
4.50 |
| 13 |
Telecosting of
Agri. Prog.through Setcom |
|
|
50 |
7.50 |
| 14 |
Dev. of Agri.
Soft ware |
|
|
5 |
3.00 |
| 15 |
Film on Agriculturel
Subject |
|
|
2 |
2.00 |
| Total |
|
|
|
222.22 |
| GOI Share 90% |
|
|
|
200.00 |
| State Share
10% |
|
|
|
22.22 |

|
| |
|
| |
Dev. Of Information Technology |
| |
PROGRAMME DETAILS
1. SCHEME CODE :
MP-A-12
2. PROGRAMME NAME
: Development of Information Technology
(DIT).
3. OBJECT OF PROGRAMME :
A database network
AGRINET is proposed to be set-up with the following
features :
1. Set-up an integrated service for
collection of grass-root level data.
2. Procurement and Installation
of Computer hardware.
3. Development of software
which can collect, analyse and disseminate information at State,Agroclimatic
Zone and district level.
4. To ensure Extera-net based network/(WAN)up
to ditrict lavel & also estiblished internet base net work.
5.
To establish a State Agriculture and Marketing Information
centre (SASMIC) with skilled personnel.
6.
Publish data, reports and literature on subject connected
with weather and crop conditions, Agriculture and Horticulture
production, Stocking and supply of inputs, market arrivals and
prices etc.
7. Assist participating
agencies in taking-up special studies related to their sector.
8.
Ensure co-ordination with Commissioner Land Records (CLR),
State Agricultural Universities and other state-wide systems
as required.
9. Enlarge
telecast through SAT COM
4. PRESENT
STATUS :
The
Information Technology scheme has been implimented since 2000-01
in the department.Details are as under :-
1.
Directorate of Agriculture has established data-base on the
following subjects:-
-
State/District-wise land use,
-
Irrigation (Source-wise & crop-wise),
-
Land holdings(No. & area)
-
Crop-wise Area, Production & Productivity ,
- Use of certified / Quality
seed,
-
Fertilizer consumption (Total & per unit area),
-
Availability of warehousing facilities, etc.
2. Department also publishes and provides related information
for researchers and management personals.
3. E-MAIL & internet facility is available at State,Agroclimatic
Zone and district level.
4.The customized software has been developed under the information
technolozy scheme for weekly monitoring of rainfall, sowing,
stocking and distribution of seeds, fertilizer, Bio-fertilizer,
agricultural implements,monitoring of Macro Management scheme
etc.
5.A software named "MONITORING OF BUDGET" with the aim to
regular monitoring & Financial riview of various programmes
of the department for the Effictive implementation.of thescheme
6. State Agriculture Forecasting Centre has been established
and it is in close contact with NCFC.
ANALYSIS
OF LAST THREE YEARS :
| YEAR |
CENTRAL SHARE |
EXPENDITURE |
|
| Previous Balance |
Release |
Total Amt. Available |
Central |
State |
Total |
|
| 2000-01 |
- |
37.45 |
37.45 |
37.36 |
4.15 |
41.51 |
| 2001-02 |
- |
57.20 |
57.20 |
56.87 |
6.32 |
63.19 |
| 2002-03* |
- |
57.00 |
57.00 |
11.57 |
1.29 |
12.85 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
AREA OF OPERATION :
(a)
All the 45 district of the state.
7
MAJOR CONSTRAINTS :
1.
Presently large volume of data is being generated but
it is not possible to analyze it for its use in decision making.
2.
There is no connectivity with the departmental offices
and other agencies.
3.
Lack of proper hardware and software at state, zonal
and district level.
4.
Lack of trained personnel.
5.
For quick transfer of technical advice to farmers Agriculinic
facility not available.
6.
Facility with deptt. Is not available for mass communication
& interaction
8 INTERVENTIONS :
1.
Providing computers and software at state, zonal and
district levels.
2.
Training to the persons on Information Technology for
efficient management of the systems.upto field lavel
3.
Up-dating of software, maintenance of hardware,Extra-net(WAN)
connectivity at every level.
4.
providing facilitig of reciving SATCOM programme
9. COMPONENTS
PROPOSED :
| S.No. |
COMPONENT |
EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF NEW COMPONENT |
| 1 |
Procurement
of Hardware and net Working |
Set-up
an integrated computer service at state & district
levels and establish Agriculture & Marketing information
centre All district will be connected through lease line/ISDN
line/Rflink/Dialup with Directorate of Agriculture(H.Q.)Bhopal.Procurment
of Hardware & Net working equipment. |
| 2 |
Purchase
and development of specific soft-wares |
For
purchase & development of use of Agriculture software. |
| 3 |
Maintenance
of Hard-wares |
For
maintenance of the computers & peripharels. |
| 4 |
Training
of personals. |
For
efficient management & use of computers |
| 5 |
SATCOM
reciving centers |
For
effective interaction on large scale |
10. JUSTIFICATION
:
1.
The broad vision for computerisation in the department would
be to fulfill the requirement for collection and analysis of
data obtained. This would help in taking decisions and planning/
modifying the schemes with feed-back provisions to extension
workers and farmers.
2
For installation of IT
System, procurement of Hardware and Software is necessary.
3.
Creation of new posts is not agreed by the State Govt.,
therefore training to the existing staff may solve the problem
to some extent.
11
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI & STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
50.00 |
5.56 |
55.56 |
12. PROPOSED
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
(Information
Technology)
Physical Targets
& Financial Requirements 2003-04
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2003-04 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Procurement of
Hardware & Networking |
|
|
|
20.00 |
| 2 |
Purchase &
development of softwares |
|
|
|
12.00 |
| 3 |
Maintenance of
Hardwares/ Stationery/ Connectivity |
|
|
|
7.00 |
| 4 |
Training of personals |
|
|
|
8.00 |
| 5 |
SATCOM Reciving
center |
|
|
|
9.56 |
| Total |
|
|
|
55.56 |
| GOI
Share 90% |
|
|
|
50.00 |
| State
Share 10% |
|
|
|
5.56 |

|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
PROGRAMME
DETAILS
1. SCHEME CODE
:MP-A-14
2. PROGRAMME NAME
:PROD,REALIANCE AND EXCHANGE SEED PROG.
3.
OBJECTS OF THE PROGRAMME :
(i)
To carry out seed exchange programmes of cereals and
oilseeds for small & marginal farmers
(ii)Develop seed
reliance amongst farmers themselves
(iii)
Implement seed production programme on Government Farms
and farmers field within 10 Kms. radius of the farm concerned.
4. PRESENT STATUS
: Last Year included under Macro Management Plan
5. ANALYSIS OF
LAST YEARS :
| YEAR |
CENTRAL SHARE |
EXPENDITURE |
|
| Previous Balance |
Release |
Total Amt. Available |
Central |
State |
Total |
|
| 2002-03* |
- |
86.42 |
86.42 |
43.16 |
4.80 |
47.96 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* up to Dec. 2002
6. AREA OF OPERATION
: All 45 districts of the State
7. MAJOR AREAS OF
CONCERN :
(i)
Majority of small and marginal poor farmers with negligible
investment capabilities.
(ii)
Traditional cultivation of uneconomical crops especially
in tribal areas.
(iii)Unawareness
of small, marginal, SC & ST & genral farmers regarding
seed and its quality.
(iv) In-effectiveness
of routine seed exchange programmes.
(v)
In-sufficient, or even non-availability of quality seeds
of improved varieties to small & marginal farmers.
(vi)
Lack of training and knowledge dissemination facilities
to these farmers.
8
INTERVENTIONS :
(i)
Systematic approach for seed exchange programme
(ii)
Effective implementation of Seed Production programmes
through Govt. Farms
(iii)
Development of Self-reliance for seed input.
.
9
PROPOSED PROGRAMME COMPONENTS :
| S.No. |
COMPONENTS |
EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF COMPONENTS |
| 1 |
Seed
Exchange |
S
& M farmers who will give the local seed he is going
to
sow, will
be replaced with high yielding improved variety
quality seed.
Value of the seed given by the farmer should
be25% of the
seed being replaced to him/her, or, will
have to pay
25% cost of the seed being provided. |
| 2 |
Seed
Production |
Small
and marginal farmers within the vicinity of 10 Kms
radius of the Govt. Farm shall be selected
for seed
production of improved varieties recommended
for the
area. Priority shall be fixed on the basis
of First come
First serve system. |
| 3 |
Seed
Reliance |
Farmers
shall be provided foundation /certified
seed for 1/10th of their cultivated area.
They will be trained
for quality seed production and shall
be provided the
required technical know-how according
to their field
conditions. |
10. JUSTIFICATION
:
(i) The
current seed organizations responsible for seed arrangement
in the state are unable to provide sufficient quantity seed
or required variety, on reasonable cost, especially to small
and marginal farmers. This scheme will take care off fulfillment
of seed requirement of all the small and marginal farmers of
the state with lowest, or, very reasonable cost.
(ii)
Currently there are three different schemes being implemented
to cover-up the above mentioned components.
(iii) These
schemes are restricted to SC and ST farmers only, while general
small and marginal farmers are not getting the benefit of these
provisions.
(iv)Training provisions in these
schemes shall benefit the state to overall increase in productivity
as these class of farmers generally get very low productivity
and drag the state average to a very low level.
11.
OUTLAY PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION OF GOI &
STATE GOVT.
| Year |
GOI |
State |
Total |
| 2003-04 |
68.00 |
7.56 |
75.55 |
12 PROPOSED
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
Physical Targets &
Financial Requirements 2002-03
| S.No. |
Component |
Unit |
Assistance
Rs./Unit |
2003-00 |
| Physical |
Financial |
| 1 |
Seed
Exchange Programme |
Hect. |
1000 |
11200 |
20.00 |
| 2 |
Seed
Reliance Programme |
Hect. |
1150 |
23470 |
41.55 |
| 3 |
Seed
Production Programme |
Hect. |
1250 |
5440 |
14.00 |
| Total |
|
|
|
75.55 |
| GOI
Share 90% |
|
|
|
68.00 |
| State
Share 10% |
|
|
|
7.55 |

|
| |
|
| |
Schemes Under Technology Mission |
| |
Oil
Seed Development Program. |
| |
Objective:
The
object of the scheme is to increase the production of oilseeds
by adopting improved agronomic practices such as use of latest
varieties, use of quality seeds, adopting of IPM technologies
against pests and diseases application of recommended fertilizers
dosages,
Increasing the area under oilseeds by introducing them in sequence
and inter-cropping system under both rain fed and irrigated
conditions, and also through diversion of area to oilseeds,
Input and support service and
Market interventions.
| S.
No. |
Name
of Component |
| 1 |
Purchas
| | | | |